Joined
·
99 Posts
Lots of good info here. Perhaps I can clarify a thing or two in this (resurrected) thread. I am in the midst of a full suspension mod, so I now feel qualified to opine.
To begin, the spring in the left fork leg of the G310GS is a normal fork spring. It is only a "helper" spring in a pedantic/marketing sense, it being weaker than the aftermarket unit in the right leg.
All other things equal, the effective spring rate for springs in parallel (e.g., fork springs) is the simple sum of the spring rate of each individual spring. Nothing more and nothing less. Hyperpro and others serving the professional installer market therefore ship two springs. Why wouldn't they? A pro installer can surely get past red Loctite and the (presumed) need for a special tool. Right? <grin>
But Rally Raid's stated market includes the DIY/prosumer crowd. Getting into that left fork leg presents a major challenge to many home mechanics. So RR, knowing that there are no damping components in the left leg that need new (thicker) fluid, came up with a right-leg-only approach. They just bumped up the spring rate for the right-side spring to achieve the effective rate that they were shooting for. Both reasonable and canny IMO (clever even).
I'll offer without proof that the RR solution presents no measurable imbalances or other technical shortcomings to the two-spring approach. Just different paths.
To begin, the spring in the left fork leg of the G310GS is a normal fork spring. It is only a "helper" spring in a pedantic/marketing sense, it being weaker than the aftermarket unit in the right leg.
All other things equal, the effective spring rate for springs in parallel (e.g., fork springs) is the simple sum of the spring rate of each individual spring. Nothing more and nothing less. Hyperpro and others serving the professional installer market therefore ship two springs. Why wouldn't they? A pro installer can surely get past red Loctite and the (presumed) need for a special tool. Right? <grin>
But Rally Raid's stated market includes the DIY/prosumer crowd. Getting into that left fork leg presents a major challenge to many home mechanics. So RR, knowing that there are no damping components in the left leg that need new (thicker) fluid, came up with a right-leg-only approach. They just bumped up the spring rate for the right-side spring to achieve the effective rate that they were shooting for. Both reasonable and canny IMO (clever even).
I'll offer without proof that the RR solution presents no measurable imbalances or other technical shortcomings to the two-spring approach. Just different paths.